Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

These Milford, Massachusetts anti-Foxwoods Casino protesters carried the day whenever project was defeated by voters recently (Image supply: AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Sorry, Foxwoods: it appears you’re not wanted in Massachusetts, either. The Connecticut gambling giant was soundly defeated at the polls this as voters in the town of Milford, Massachusetts decided that they didn’t want a casino resort in their backyards week.

Three Down for the voter that is( Count

This is now a story that is routine Massachusetts, where voters rejected proposals in East Boston and Palmer earlier this month. In this instance, Foxwoods ended up being looking to develop a $1 billion complex in the town that is boston-area compete for that region’s sole casino license.

When the first returns began coming in, it absolutely was clear that the casino vote was not going to get Foxwoods’ way. CEO Scott Butera quickly conceded defeat when the polls closed, telling casino supporters that the vote meant that plans for the casino would absolutely not be going forward. Once all the votes had been in, the margin ended up being enormous: 6,361 against the plan, and 3,480 for it, or around a 65%-35% split.

Foxwoods spent a large amount of cash marketing the casino, but it had beenn’t enough to convince locals that it was a good deal for the local economy, apparently. As they promoted the truth that there is numerous brand new jobs created and much more than $30 million in new income for the town, the opposition carried the time.

‘Our city wasn’t for purchase,’ said John Seaver of the group that is anti-casino Milford. ‘They wanted to come in and call the shots, and they almost did. Nevertheless the social people rose up, pushed right back and overwhelmingly said ‘this town is not for purchase.”

Opponents warned that adding a casino resort could increase criminal activity within the town, along with depress property values. That, along with warnings of massive traffic jams, was seemingly enough to convince most residents that are milford vote ‘no’.

According to Butera, though, the real problem is that myths about casino gambling are influencing voters, significantly more than arguments in benefit of building the resorts.

‘I think people are afraid for the unknown,’ Butera stated. ‘There’s a lot of myths by what gambling enterprises are…they are not these crazy places that are hedonistic. They’re actually very nice resorts that have actually much more to do [than] just games.’

The Milford vote was the final one planned at the least for the time being among a series of binding referendums held by towns over whether they would approve casinos integrated their towns. Applications can still come set for the three casino licenses and the one slot parlor permit in the state before the end of the 12 months, nevertheless.

Whilst the results that are recent casino organizations have been poor in these votes, other businesses have experienced more success. Both Wynn Resorts and MGM have successfully had projects approved by their regional communities, permitting them to compete for licenses into the Greater Boston Area and Massachusetts that is western. Three towns have previously supported intends to build smaller slots parlors in their communities, though only one will ultimately get a license through the state.

Other projects still hang within the stability. Mohegan Sun narrowly destroyed a vote to approve a casino in Palmer so narrowly, in reality, that they are getting a recount that is official of results later this month. Meanwhile, Suffolk Downs in East Boston is taking into consideration the chance of changing their plan and placing the entirety of the casino resort in neighboring Revere, which voted in favor of allowing them to build there.

New Jersey Online Gambling Soft Publish Is Not Without Glitches

The New Jersey online casino soft launch has not been without some snafus. Which can be why, ahem, you do soft launches.

New Jersey’s soft launch of these online gambling platform was, for the part that is most, a success. The games work, the sites are up and running, as well as the verification systems are doing their job. In reality, the only real problem is that those systems were working a little way too hard, as quite a few residents had trouble proving they were really in brand New Jersey.

We Have Launch…Sort Of

On Nov. 21, the launch that is soft of very first round of web gambling internet sites went live for players located in brand New Jersey. During the soft launch which is made to weed out any bugs and ensure things were working as planned only about 500 players were allowed for each site. Nevertheless, genuine money play was available, making this the first time state-regulated on the web gambling had occurred in New Jersey.

Seven casinos were approved to run websites at the time of the launch. The Borgata was included by them, Trump Plaza, the Taj Mahal, the Golden Nugget, Tropicana, Bally’s, and Caesars Atlantic City. Combined, those sites could actually run 14 gambling internet sites, including a mix of both casino and poker that is online.

Assuming all goes well in this soft launch period which expands to the ‘real’ launch date of Nov. 26 online gambling will be available to all residents in nj older than 21 starting early week that is next. But according to some customers, there are certainly kinks in the operational system that still need to be ironed out.

As we reported earlier, the absolute most predominant issue therefore far ended up being also the one that was the many predictable. Numerous people had trouble logging into the sites because of the reality that either the geolocation software used could not be sure they were in New Jersey, or they certainly weren’t immediately able to meet other verification standards in order to prove their residency.

Inaccessible

For instance, some players tried logging in from different locations and nevertheless couldn’t look for a real option to access any associated with the web sites. New Jersey resident Joseph Brennen reportedly attempted to log in from a McDonald’s in Atlantic City, but was told by various web sites that they couldn’t tell where he had been situated, or that they didn’t think he was in New Jersey. Then he tried driving inland and north about five miles, yet still could not obtain the sites to recognize he was in the state.

Driving another ten kilometers inland and attempting to connect from a restaurant additionally neglected to create any results. Though some associated with the sites now permitted him to register accounts, they still wanted some proof of residency such as for example a software application bill which he couldn’t straight away provide.

And Brennen ended up beingn’t the one that is only went into such problems.

‘I made a small deposit, however when I attempted to play they said I wasn’t in nj,’ said Tina Gonzalez, who possessed a long call with customer service and saw her computer crash while trying to create an account up on Caesars’ website. ‘I’m afraid that after they attempt to do this statewide in the 26th, it’s going to be mayhem.’

While few individuals reported those sorts of technical problems, the failure to prove one’s location was more widespread. While many industry specialists predicted some individuals would get locked out of the sites because of being very near to this new Jersey border, it’s unclear why this was occurring just as much as 10 to 15 miles away from the state’s borders as well.

Hopefully, these issues are circumvented by the hard launch date to come.

‘ The soft opening will be employed to show the division that all systems perform as required beneath the stress of real time gaming and that operational and revenue reporting controls work well. Staff will continually measure the progress of each and every platform provider before enabling them to start gaming to the public that is general November 26,’ said DGE Director David Rebuck in a statement.

London’s Hippodrome Brings in Door Dwarves Amidst Controversy

Well-known little person and star Peter Dinklage is not likely to be applying at the Hippodrome (Image source: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

In a controversial move that could be regarded as exploitative or helpful dependent on your viewpoint who owns the Hippodrome, the casino that is largest in the united kingdom , has put out an ad to let the world understand he is looking to hire little people as ‘door dwarves’ during the venue for the vacations.

Risking being called a circus carney, the owner advertised for the jobs in the widely read Metro newspaper, stating that winner casino free spins the casino is looking to ‘create a group of Britain’s tiniest bouncers Door Dwarves for the new entry in Cranbourn Street.’

Owner Claims Success

Based on reports, trials of the initiative, which would introduce a force of individuals 4 legs 10 inches or smaller to man the entry to the casino, were said to have gone ‘fantastically’ well, so when a result, the management at the place has been convinced to introduce the system for a full-time basis.

CEO and chairman of the casino Simon Thomas, attempting to justify the scheme, explained to the media that the system was just the latest in a long line of dwarf employment opportunities at the Leicester Square casino.

‘The Hippodrome is a phenomenal london institution. It opened in 1900 as a circus that is indoor people like Little Titch in the cast,’ explained Thomas, incorporating that legendary P.T. Barnum had circus performer and small individual Tom Thumb perform at the venue back in the day.

‘We had high-diving dwarves who dived through the mistrals’ gallery 60-feet up into a water tank,’ he included. ‘So they’re very part that is much of history associated with the place.’

How charming can you get. It is like Cirque du Soleil, however the shortstuff version.

Interesting Logic

Since bouncers are typically very large, wide and menacing-looking figures, who the common Joe would like not to ever get a cross, hiring a team of smaller personnel does appear such as a move that is strange the casino if they’re seeking to deter the riff-raff from causing trouble during the site.

‘Nobody messes with a dwarf, so in a way, they truly are very doorman that is good’ argued Thomas. ‘They can handle people a lot better than having a individual eclipse on the door as a number of the groups do in London. No body is going to select on someone who is below-average height. It’s not quite a macho thing to do, it is therefore an excellent way of controlling the entranceway.

‘ There is no discrimination at all,’ claimed Thomas, gathering to borrow possibly the many over-used phrase associated with century that is 21st dispute complaints that the place could be poking fun at small people. ‘I find we inhabit a world of political correctness gone angry.’

But that it is, at the very least, exploiting them if we are to take the opinion that the job role is not poking fun at little people, should we perhaps take the opinion? Thomas himself claimed that the initiative is ‘building on the heritage that is rich of activity’ so clearly it is not just their unintimidating stature which he wishes to utilize.

‘I am attempting to run a tremendously big entertaining complex and I also have lot of different people with lots of different skills,’ explained the Hippodrome president. ‘I have chosen those skills and physical attributes that are appropriate to that job. They’re highly expert and ‘ve got to begin it.’

Close Menu