A November New York State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording
In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that will allow several casino that is new to be built through the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is successful, that referendum shall be halted due to language in the ballot question he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum carries a quantity of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposal in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the concern mentions ‘promoting task growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by hawaii Board of Elections in July.
But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. According to a lawsuit filed into the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the utilization of public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use money that is public sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has brought up problems with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also see it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used when telling (more…)